Overview So far in the course, you have learned about single-subject design rese

Overview
So far in the course, you have learned about single-subject design research methodologies. You will now apply what you have learned about these different research designs by describing how you will apply single-subject methodologies to four given scenarios. Relying on research to justify your choices is essential to ensure evidence-based practice. You will then graph one of the designs to show the results of the application of the design to the given scenario.
Instructions
For this assignment, complete the following using the Applying Single-Subject Research Methodologies [DOCX] template:
Read through these scenarios. Each scenario corresponds to one of the single-subject research methods commonly employed by behavior analysts.Scenario 1 – Multiple Baseline Design: Suppose you have two preschool students who engage in disruptive behavior in the classroom, and you want to evaluate an intervention to decrease the disruptive behavior. Describe how you would use a multiple baseline across subjects design to evaluate the intervention in this scenario.
Scenario 2 – Withdrawal Design: Rowan walks out of his Math class every day when work is delivered to his desk. The teacher believes that he is exhibiting this behavior to escape academic tasks. How would you use a withdrawal design to determine if, in fact, Rowan is trying to escape the math tasks?
Scenario 3 – Alternative Treatments Design: Susan is trying to develop an exercise routine for herself. She wants to determine if she does better sticking to a routine if she participates regularly in a structured class, or if she exercises alone using equipment she has in the home, like workout videos, weight bench, bicycle, et cetera. How would you use an alternating treatment design to determine which type of exercise routine is most effective for Susan?
Scenario 4 – Changing Criterion Design: Marvin is drinking excessive amounts of caffeine. He has chosen to try to decrease his coffee consumption gradually from 8 cups a day down to 1 cup. He has set a goal date of 8 weeks from the start of the plan. How would Marvin use a changing criterion design to help track his progress as he attempts to decrease this caffeine consumption?
Complete the following for each scenario:Describe how you would apply that design to achieve the desired results.
Justify your proposed application process by citing a recent peer-reviewed article that effectively demonstrates a similar application of that methodology. (You cannot use the articles that you have read in previous studies.) Use the BS in Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) Library Research GuideLinks to an external site. to help with your research.
Select one of the scenarios and design a graph that will depict the results of the application of the research to the identified problem.
Be sure to complete the self-assessment grading rubric included in the template.
Additional Requirements
Written communication: Employ academic communication skills that are scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others, in a manner consistent with members of the psychology profession.
APA formatting: Use current APA style and formatting, paying particular attention to citations and references. Use Academic WriterLinks to an external site. for guidance in citing sources in proper APA style. See the Writing CenterLinks to an external site. for more APA resources specific to your degree level.
Length: 6–8 pages, excluding the cover page and references list. Include page numbers, headings, and running heads. No abstract is required.
References: A minimum of four scholarly or professional resources.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assignment you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and rubric criteria:
Competency 1: Apply research methods and designs used in applied behavior analysis.Describe the appropriate application of research methods and designs to address specific problems.
Competency 3: Construct displays of data collection and interpretation in behavioral measurement.Construct a graph that depicts the results of the application of a single-subject research design to an identified problem.
Competency 4: Analyze the effectiveness of behavioral interventions presented in single-subject experimental research.Analyze the effectiveness of behavioral interventions presented in single-subject experimental research as they pertain to identified problems.
Competency 5: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly and consistent with expectations for professionals in the field of psychology.Include a self-assessment grading rubric that is mostly accurate with few errors.
Write coherently to support a central idea, with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics as expected of a psychology professional.
Successfully implement APA style.
View Rubric
Week 6 Assignment 2: Applying Single-Subject Research Methodologies
Week 6 Assignment 2: Applying Single-Subject Research Methodologies
CriteriaRatingsPts
Describe the appropriate application of research methods and designs to address specific problems.42.5 to >36.13 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Provides appropriate, detailed applications of research methods and designs to address each specific problem. Also provides thorough justification for the application processes proposed.36.13 to >29.75 pts
PROFICIENT
Describes the appropriate application of research methods and designs to address specific problems.29.75 to >0 pts
BASIC
Proposes applications for the specified research methods and designs that do not coincide with the identified single-subject research methodologies.0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not describe the appropriate application of research methods and designs to address specific problems./ 42.5 pts
Analyze the effectiveness of behavioral interventions presented in single-subject experimental research as they pertain to identified problems.
42.5 to >36.13 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Analyzes the effectiveness of behavioral interventions presented in single-subject research as they pertain to identified problems, and provides justification as to why the research selected best supports their proposed application of the process.36.13 to >29.75 pts
PROFICIENT
Analyzes the effectiveness of behavioral interventions presented in single-subject experimental research as they pertain to identified problems.29.75 to >0 pts
BASIC
Identifies articles that are related to each type of single-subject interventions, but they do not support the proposed applications of these research methods to identified problems.0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not analyze the effectiveness of behavioral interventions presented in single-subject experimental research as they pertain to identified problems./ 42.5 pts
Construct a graph that depicts the results of the application of a single-subject research design to an identified problem.
42.5 to >36.13 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Constructs a graph that depicts the results of the application of a single-subject research design to an identified problem. Provides a description of how this graph will help support the development of an appropriate treatment plan.36.13 to >29.75 pts
PROFICIENT
Constructs a graph that depicts the results of the application of a single-subject research design to an identified problem.29.75 to >0 pts
BASIC
Constructs a graph that is not appropriate to the type of single-subject research design selected.0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not construct a graph that depicts the results of the application of a single-subject research design to an identified problem./ 42.5 pts
Include a self-assessment grading rubric that is mostly accurate with few errors.
8.5 to >7.23 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Includes a grading rubric and is accurate with self-assessment.7.23 to >5.95 pts
PROFICIENT
Includes a self-assessment grading rubric that is mostly accurate with few errors.5.95 to >0 pts
BASIC
Includes a grading rubric but does not accurately assess one’s own performance.0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not include a grading rubric with self-assessed score./ 8.5 pts
Write coherently to support a central idea, with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics as expected of a psychology professional.
17 to >14.45 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Writes coherently, using evidence to support a central idea, with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics, as expected of a psychology professional.14.45 to >11.9 pts
PROFICIENT
Writing coherently supports a central idea, with few errors of grammar, usage, and mechanics.11.9 to >0 pts
BASIC
Writes to support an idea but is inconsistent. Writing contains numerous errors of grammar, usage, and mechanics.0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Writing does not support a central idea. Does not employ correct grammar, usage, and mechanics as expected of a psychology professional./ 17 pts
Successfully implement APA style.
17 to >14.45 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Applies scholarly writing skills, using proper APA formatting and style in the body of the paper and in the references list.14.45 to >11.9 pts
PROFICIENT
Successfully implements APA style, with only minor errors in format.11.9 to >0 pts
BASIC
Writes adequately, with some APA errors and inconsistencies.0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not apply proper APA formatting and style./ 17 pts